A consortium of researchers dedicated to improving the understanding of the human causes and consequences of terrorism

Prosecuting Terrorism: Challenges in the Post-9/11 World

Abstract:
Purpose

In this chapter, we provide a brief historical framework of the events and policy changes that impacted the prosecution of terrorism over the past 50 years with emphasis placed on the changes that resulted from the 9/11 attacks.

Methodology/approach

We provide a review of relevant literature and complete the chapter by providing new data (2015) on case outcomes derived from the American Terrorism Study, a database housed in the Terrorism Research Center in Fulbright College, at the University of Arkansas.

Findings

Investigative and prosecutorial authority in U.S. terrorism cases has experienced ebbs and flows that correspond with terrorism attacks as well as missteps by the FBI, and each has impacted the success of prosecution efforts. Despite dramatic changes, the number of cases prosecuted after 9/11 is unprecedented, and conviction rates continue to climb.

Originality/value

This chapter provides the reader with a synopsis of the policy changes that have occurred in federal terrorism investigations and trials from the late 1960s upto the present. Based on that context, we provide an explanation of how those policy changes have impacted terrorism prosecutions.

Publication Information

Full Citation:

Shields, Christopher A., Brent L. Smith and Kelly R. Damphousse. 2015. "Prosecuting Terrorism: Challenges in the Post-9/11 World." Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance 20 (September): 173-195. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/S1521-613620150000020013

START Author(s):

Additional Info

Research Area:
Regions: