Incident Summary:
07/30/2010: On Friday morning around 0800, on Soulmari-Goalpara PWD road where Soulmari meets National Highway 37 at Bhalukdubi near Goalpara, Assam, India, an improvised explosive device detonated near a bus. At least five Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) troopers were killed and 33 others injured. Reportedly, the bomb was planted on the western edge of the highway and was triggered off by a 50-foot long wire. The bus carrying 45 jawans of the CRPF's 12 battalion was returning to its Goalpara camp from Balijana, 13 kilometers away, where they undergo regular counter-insurgency training. Upon reaching Bhalukdubi near Kali Mondir, the bomb was detonated. The bus was badly damaged in the attack. Four of the five killed were identified as Punam Sen, Ranbir Singh, Sri Nibas and Mongal Nayak of the 12 Battalion of CRPF. Anu Buragohain, the spokesperson of the United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA) claimed responsibility for the attack, saying that the attack was carried out in retaliation against security forces continuing to target its cadres. He also warned of more attacks. However, police officials believe that the anti-peace talk faction of the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB) were responsible for the attack.
Overview
GTD ID:
201007300005
When:
2010-07-30
Country:
India
Region:
South Asia
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Assam
City:
Bhalukdubi
Location Details:
The attack took place on Soulmari-Goalpara PWD road where Soulmari meets National Highway 37 at Bhalukdubi near Goalpara.
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Bombing/Explosion |
Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Police |
Name of Entity |
Central Reserve Police Force |
Specific Description |
Security forces belonging to the Central Reserve Police Force |
Nationality of Target |
India |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
Yes |
Extent of Property Damage |
Minor (likely < $1 million) |
Value of Property Damage |
Unknown |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Explosives |
Remote Trigger |
Weapon Details |
A roadside planted explosive device detonated by a three meter command wire was used in the attack. |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Doubt Terrorism Proper () |
No |
Additional Information |
The most recent available sources listed the fatalities for this attack from four to five, and the injuries for this attack from 30 to 33 to 36 to 40, so the majority casualty figures have been used in order to preserve statistical accuracy in the database. The most recent available sources listed the time of the attack from 0800 to 0830, so the majority time reported has been used in order to preserve statistical accuracy in the database. The most recent available sources listed the number of buses targeted in this attack from one to two, so the majority number of buses reported has been used in order to preserve statistical accuracy in the database. |
Who
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
0 |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
5 Fatalities / 33 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
5 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
33 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
Xiong Tong, "Four Security Personnel Killed, 36 Injured in Blast in NE India," Xinhua News Agency, July 30, 2010, http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-07/30/c_13422578.htm. |
Bijoy Kr Sarma, "Five CRPF Men Die in Blast," LexisNexis Academic, Telegraph, July 30, 2010. |
Asian Age, "Five CRPF Jawans Die," http://www.asianage.com/india/five-crpf-jawans-die-194 (July 31, 2010). |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties