Incident Summary:
06/24/2007: An incendiary device and flammable liquids were planted next to the BMW vehicle of UCLA professor, Arthur Rosenbaum, outside of his residence at 465 Loring Avenue in Los Angeles, California in the United States. The device was lit, but because of a malfunctioned fuse, it did not ignite. Thus, there were no injuries, nor damage. In a communiqué issued to the North American Animal Liberation Press Office, the Animal Liberation Brigade claimed responsibility for the attempted firebombing, stating that Rosenbaum, who had been regularly harassed by animal-rights activists for his research work with cats and monkeys, should watch his back or he would face injections into his eyes like the primates. Though the L.A. field office for the U.S. Department of Justice ATF Bureau put out a $110,000 reward for information on the perpetrators, no individual perpetrators were identified from the anonymous claim.
Overview
GTD ID:
200706240004
When:
2007-06-24
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
California
City:
Los Angeles
Location Details:
outside 465 Loring Ave., the residence of UCLA researcher
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Facility/Infrastructure Attack |
Successful Attack? () |
No |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Educational Institution |
Name of Entity |
UCLA Professor |
Specific Description |
UCLA Professor, Arthur Rosenbaum's personal vehicle |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
No |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Incendiary |
Gasoline or Alcohol |
Weapon Details |
incendiary device w/ fuse and 1 gallon of fuel |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Doubt Terrorism Proper () |
No |
Additional Information |
The professor had been a target of harassment in the past by animal rights activists through phone calls, emails and intimidating threats screamed over bullhorns. |
Who
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
0 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
"Attempted Firebombing of UCLA Researcher's Car Investigated as Terrorism," City News Service, June 28, 2007. |
Patrick Range McDonald, "Monkey Madness at Ucla; Violent radicals aim to kill Jules Stein Eye Institute researchers who test on animals," LA Weekly (California), August 9, 2007. |
"Reward Offered for Information Leading to Arrest of Those Responsible For Attempted Terrorist Attack at Home of University of California: Los Angeles Professor," US Fed News, July 24, 2007. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties