Incident Summary:
01/29/1989: Suspected members of Earth First! claimed to have set fire to the Dixon Livestock Auction Company building in Dixon, California (about 20 miles west of Sacramento) in the United States, causing about $250,000 worth of damage. There were no casualties in the incident, but the arson, which was caused by an incendiary device planted in the building, destroyed half of the two-story rural warehouse used for livestock auctions. After the incident, a male caller, identifying himself as a member of the Earth First! group, phoned the Associated Press in San Francisco and claimed responsibility for the incident, stating that the motive for targeting the livestock industry was "because we are opposed to the livestock industry because it causes irreparable damage to the environment by putting chemicals in food and water and destroying natural habitat for wildlife. We will continue carrying out our actions against the livestock industry in the future until it stops.''
Overview
GTD ID:
198901290015
When:
1989-01-29
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
California
City:
Dixon
Location Details:
at livestock auction building in Dixon, CA
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Facility/Infrastructure Attack |
Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Business |
Name of Entity |
Dixon Livestock Auction Company |
Specific Description |
Dixon Livestock Auction Company building |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
Yes |
Extent of Property Damage |
Minor (likely < $1 million) |
Value of Property Damage |
$250,000.00 |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Incendiary |
Arson/Fire |
Weapon Details |
ignited incendiary device |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Additional Information |
Although a caller, claiming to be a member of Earth First! claimed responsibility for the incident in the name of the group, a spokesperson for the group stated that he had no knowledge of the fire or any such actions, but that it may have been committed by Earth First members, so it is uncertain that this group was definitely responsible, though it is most likely. Additionally, at the same time as this arson incident, the same Earth First! caller also claimed responsibility for slogans such as "Earth First! Agri-Bus kills" which were spray-painted on the walls of the California Cattlemen's Association office in Sacramento as well as graffiti at the California Wool Growers Association and the Agricultural Council of California near the State Capitol in Sacramento. |
Who
Perpetrator Group Information
Group Name |
Claimed Responsibility |
Earth First! (suspected) |
Yes (Confirmed: Unknown; Mode: Call (post-incident)) |
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
Unknown |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
0 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
"Livestock Auction House Burns; Caller Claims Responsibility," The Associated Press, January 29,1989. |
"Caller claims responsibility for auction building fire," United Press International, January 29, 1989. |
"Arson suspected in auction building fire," Lodi News-Sentinel, January 30, 1989. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties