Incident Summary:
10/05/1987: Members of a group calling itself the "Evan Mecham Eco-Terrorist International Conspiracy" (EMETIC), claimed responsibility for using an acetylene torch to cut through support bolts in twelve pylons connected to cables which held the main ski chairlift at the Fairfield Snow Bowl Ski Resort in Flagstaff, Arizona in the United States. The propane torches were used to cut the polls along the newest chairlift at Agassiz Peak, and additionally, the perpetrators smashed windows at the terminal stations at the top of the lift as well as at a building used by ski patrol in the winter. There were no casualties, but the property damage was estimated at $100,000. In a letter to local media outlets after the incident, the group stated more sabotage would follow. Marc Leslie Davis and Margaret Katherine Millet, were arrested and in 1991, pled guilty and sentenced for their involvement in this incident.
Overview
GTD ID:
198710050012
When:
1987-10-05
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Arizona
City:
Flagstaff
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Facility/Infrastructure Attack |
Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Business |
Name of Entity |
Fairfield Snow Bowl Ski Resort |
Specific Description |
cables of the main chairlift at the Fairfield Snow Bowl Ski Resort in Flagstaff, AZ |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
Yes |
Extent of Property Damage |
Minor (likely < $1 million) |
Value of Property Damage |
$100,000.00 |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Sabotage Equipment |
|
Weapon Details |
propane (acetylene) torch |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Additional Information |
Although the lift was closed for winter opening preparation at the time of the incident, and no casualties occurred, the chairlift has the capability of holding 900 passengers on their way to the slopes and had the damage not been detected, serious injury, and even death may have occurred. Ilse Asplund and Marc Baker, two other members of the group, may have also been involved in this incident, but it is uncertain. Though, they were involved and charged (along with Marc Leslie Davis and Margaret Katherine Millet) in the November 1987 and October 1988 similar incidents of sabotage against the Fairfield Snow Bowl Ski area. It is unclear if this group is an offshoot of Earth First!; however, a member of the Earth First! group was arrested in regards to these incidents for donating funds to EMETIC. |
Who
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
2 |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
2 |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 0 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
0 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
0 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
"Eco-Terrorism and Lawlessness on the National Forests," Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony, Capitol Hill Hearing Testimony, February 12, 2002. |
"Environmentalist placed at scene of ski lift vandalism," United Press International, June 20, 1991. |
"Vandals Hit Ski Area Equipment," Mohave Daily Miner, October 9, 1987. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties