Incident Summary:
04/19/1980: Three Ku Klux Klansmen, shot four black women, who were standing in crowd on a downtown street corner in predominantly black community in Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States. The Klansmen, William Church (imperial wizard of the Justice Knights of the Ku Klux Klan), Larry Payne, and Marshall Thrash, fired the shots from a shotgun, while driving by in a car shortly after setting two wooden crosses on fire just a few blocks away. The women were wounded, but all treated for their injuries and survived. This incident occurred during a time of racial tensions in the community. All three Klansmen were brought to trial on four counts of assault with intent to commit murder; Church and Payne were acquitted by an all-white jury, and Thrash was convicted of the shooting and sentenced to 20 months in prison and a fine.
Overview
GTD ID:
198004190010
When:
1980-04-19
Country:
United States
Region:
North America
Province/administrative
region/u.s. state:
Tennessee
City:
Chattanooga
Location Details:
at crowd on downtown street corner in predominantly black community
What
Attack Information
Type of Attack () |
Armed Assault |
Successful Attack? () |
Yes |
Target Information ()
Target Type: Private Citizens & Property |
Name of Entity |
|
Specific Description |
four black women; Lela May Evaes, Kathline Johnson, Viola S. Ellison, Opal Lee Jackson |
Nationality of Target |
United States |
Additional Information
Hostages |
No |
Ransom |
No |
Property Damage |
Unknown |
Extent of Property Damage |
Unknown |
Value of Property Damage |
Unknown |
How
Weapon Information
Type |
Sub-type |
Firearms |
Rifle/Shotgun (non-automatic) |
Weapon Details |
shotgun |
Additional Information
Suicide Attack? | No |
Part of Multiple Incident? | No |
Criterion 1 () |
Yes |
Criterion 2 () |
Yes |
Criterion 3 () |
Yes |
Additional Information |
Two crosses were burned just a few blocks from where the shooting occurred, and the men were also charged in a separate incident on the same night where shots were fired into a parked car and the shattered glass wounded a black woman nearby. |
Who
Perpetrator Group Information
Group Name |
Claimed Responsibility |
Ku Klux Klan |
No |
Perpetrator Statistics
Number of Perpetrators |
3 |
Number of Captured Perpetrators |
3 |
Casualty Information
Total Number of Casualties |
0 Fatalities / 4 Injured |
Total Number of Fatalities |
0 |
Number of U.S. Fatalities |
0 |
Number of Perpetrator Fatalities |
0 |
Total Number of Injured |
4 |
Number of U.S. Injured |
4 |
Number of Perpetrators Injured |
0 |
Sources
Sources
"Klansmen Held in Shootings," New York Times, April 19, 1980. |
"Klansmen Arrested in Shooting," The Washington Post, April 20, 1980. |
"Klansman Convicted, 2 Freed In Wounding of Black Women," The Washington Post, July 23, 1980. |
Criteria
Criteria 1
The act must be aimed at attaining a political, economic, religious, or social goal. In terms of economic goals, the exclusive pursuit of profit does not satisfy this criterion. It must involve the pursuit of more profound, systemic economic change.
Criterion 2
There must be evidence of an intention to coerce, intimidate, or convey some other message to a larger audience (or audiences) than the immediate victims. It is the act taken as a totality that is considered, irrespective if every individual involved in carrying out the act was aware of this intention. As long as any of the planners or decision-makers behind the attack intended to coerce, intimidate or publicize, the intentionality criterion is met.
Criterion 3
The action must be outside the context of legitimate warfare activities. That is, the act must be outside the parameters permitted by international humanitarian law (particularly the prohibition against deliberately targeting civilians or non-combatants.
Doubt Terrorism Proper
The existence of a "Yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper?" records reservation, in the eyes of GTD analysts, that the incident in question is truly terrorism. Such uncertainty, however, was not deemed to be sufficient to disqualify the incident from inclusion into the GTD. Furthermore, such a determination of doubt is subsequently coded by GTD analysts as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Alternate Designation
The determination of "yes" for "Doubt Terrorism Proper" by GTD analysts is coded as conforming to one of four possible alternative designations: 1) Insurgency/Guerilla Action; 2) Internecine Conflict Action; 3) Mass Murder; or 4) Purely Criminal Act.
Successful Attack
Success of a terrorist strike is defined according to the tangible effects of the attack. For example, in a typical successful bombing, the bomb detonates and destroys property and/or kills individuals, whereas an unsuccessful bombing is one in which the bomb is discovered and defused or detonates early and kills the perpetrators. Success is not judged in terms of the larger goals of the perpetrators. For example, a bomb that exploded in a building would be counted as a success even if it did not, for example, succeed in bringing the building down or inducing government repression.
Type of Attack
This field captures the general method of attack and often reflects the broad class of tactics used. It consists of the following nine categories:
- Assassination
- Armed Assault
- Unarmed Assault
- Bombing/Explosion
- Hijacking
- Hostage taking (Barricade Incident)
- Hostage taking (Kidnapping)
- Facility / Infrastructure Attack
- Unknown
Target Information
This field captures the general type of target. It consists of the following 22 categories:
- Abortion Related
- Airports & Airlines
- Business
- Government (General)
- Government (Diplomatic)
- Educational Institution
- Food or Water Supply
- Journalists & Media
- Maritime (includes Ports and Maritime facilities)
- Military
- NGO
- Other
- Police
- Private Citizens & Property
- Religious Figures/Institutions
- Telecommunication
- Terrorists
- Tourists
- Transportation (other than aviation)
- Unknown
- Utilities
- Violent Political Parties