It would be comforting to be able to find some constants, some footholds in our understanding of terrorism. It is, in fact, the element of mystery as to what drives people to collective violence that makes us uncomfortable that fills us with terror. Researchers, policy makers, those who must combat terrorism, and the public hope for some simple formula for radicalization, a program or set of programs that will prevent groups of people from deliberately targeting other people in order to meet their needs (political, economic, social, etc). There is no magic formula within this paper collection, but there are a variety of perspectives that, either in isolation or when integrated, provide new ways to think about terrorism and potentially to inform decisions that will abate this global phenomenon, not exacerbate it.
Asal, Victor, and Shawn Teresa Flanigan, Rohan Gunaratna, Frank Hairgrove, Richard Legault, Anthony Lemieux, Clark McCauley, et. al. 2010. "Protecting the Homeland from International and Domestric Terrorism Threats: Current Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives on Root Causes, the Role of Ideology, and Programs for Counter-radicalization and Disengagement." Washington D.C.:White Papers, Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment and Air Force Research Laboratory.